Tom Lumsden, a partner at CooperBurnett LLP, discusses where providers and developers stand when building or extending care homes on land affected by restrictive covenants
Many care home operators will decide at some point to extend an existing care home. Aside from the need to obtain consents such as Planning Permission, Listed Building Consent, Building Control Regulations Approval, easements/wayleaves from the statutory undertakers (such as electricity, gas, and drainage companies for enhanced services), the issue of restrictive covenants is often overlooked.
A restrictive covenant is a legally binding promise, registered in the title deeds of a property, which requires the care home owner not to do the things specified. A restrictive covenant differs from a positive covenant (where the relevant party is required to take action or do something). Examples of restrictive covenants include: not to build on land; not to use the property for a specified purpose; not to erect an extension or carry out alterations to buildings, or not to do so without the prior written consent of the adjoining landowner. There is in theory no limit to the scope and variety of restrictive covenants.
The burden of a restrictive covenant (this means the obligation to comply with the restrictive covenant) can often be enforced against successors in title to the care home.
Log in or register FREE to read the rest
This story is Premium Content and is only available to registered users. Please log in at the top of the page to view the full text.
If you don't already have an account, please register with us completely free of charge.